Tuesday, August 23, 2022

Here's my theory of the day. And I'm sticking to it until the sun sets.

There are two kinds of novelists, the ones who like to point out how we're all alike, and the ones who like to point out how we're all different.

John Grisham definitely gets a kick out of showing us how we're all part of one herd called the human herd. In his novel, Sycamore Row, he predicates the appeal of his novel based on an all-out courtroom battle waged by relatives of a newly deceased multi-millionaire businessman who are determined to inherit his estate.

It's unfortunate that the wealthy character whose name is Seth Hubbard, didn't leave his estate to them in the latest version of his will which he wrote and dated the day before he died.

Seth's relatives, the relatively normal, upper-middle class, educated white Southerners, soon learn that they're about to inherit nothing.

The story revolves around their indignation and disappointment when they learn the single person who will be inheriting Seth Hubbard's entire estate is Seth Hubbard's former housekeeper, Lettie Lang.

If you've read John Grisham novels, you know many of them take place in the rural South, in a fictional place called Clanton, Mississippi. And I'll bet you can already guess that this former housekeeper who's about to inherit Seth Hubbard's entire estate is African-American. Don't be surprised when the white residents of Clanton get all bent out of shape by the prospect of having an African-American multimillionaire living among them.

Setting aside for a moment the well documented mores and customs of the rural South, I wonder why anyone would want to sign up to read a novel about relatively well-off white people motivated by greed acting badly. But you see? That's the appeal of reading a novelist who actively wants to posit that all people have the capacity to act equally as badly when visions of inherited sugarplums are yanked away just before they appear.

John Grisham relishes dramatizing a family that's about to take part in a "legal brawl" in hopes of inheriting millions. That's what you get reading an author who loves to point out how we're all alike. When I look at the human race as I think Grisham does, I have to admit, maybe we are alike: We're limited. We're ignorant. We're deficient. We fall short. We fail. We fight until we forget what we've been fighting for.

Now posit that kind of novel against the opposite kind where the author loves to point out how we're all different, let's say for the sake of argument, Anthony Doerr's Cloud Atlas or Amor Towel's Lincoln Highway. Although many would call both novels literary—and maybe they are—with every page we read in those stories, we find the characters themselves turning, by which I mean they're either revealing themselves or maturing, or at least changing as people before our eyes which gives those authors trmendous opportunity to have us as readers feel wonder, surprise or a sense of adventure with every turn of the page.

Well, that's my theory. When you start with human limitation (we're all alike) as your moral construct, the world looks like a far more bleak and colorless place. Sure there are entertaining high jinks. Sure there's courtroom drama. But I'd opt for wonder, surprise or adventure any day, wouldn't you?

Next month: More about Sycamore Row—what works and what doesn't

.

Monday, July 25, 2022

The Magic of Amor Towles

If fiction at its best is, as one famous novelist once wrote, a continuous fictive dream, I nominate Amor Towles, most recently author of Lincoln Highway,as dream director extraordinaire.

It's not just that the story being told sounds like someone who is as guilty as sin trying to talk his/her way out of a traffic ticket; it's also that the events reel out one after another so inevitably, so plausibly, with a blush of childlike innocence, you want to laugh and forgive them their crazy schemes because they make us want to believe there's capacity for goodness at the core of their souls.

What I love about Lincoln Highway is this: It's literary adventure at its finest. At its heart, it's an action story with a heart; it's a stupendous one-of-a-kind adventure tale that involves the reader in pure story from the first page until the last.

The opening is notable because it's a homecoming, which usually occurs at the end of a story, so it immediately pulls you in—gives us, as readers, a new beginning, a new story to read, just as one of the characters who is being released from a juvenile detention facility, is being given a new beginning in life.

The experience of reading it? Well, it's like you jumping on a fast-moving freight train that then accelerates, pulling you along relentlessly 'til the end.

That's what I love about the book; at first it seems to take us from Nebraska to California, but then it turns and takes us magically from Nebraska to New York and reminds us of the richness of America in the 1950s when we were young and immortal and everything was possible, a time before cell phones, a time of freight trains and unbelievable wealth.

It suggested to me America's faded glory, how rich we were as a country, how rich we still are and how possible everything still is in relative terms—even in this summer of global climate change—how close we came and still could come; how great we could be again.

Thursday, June 23, 2022

What Makes John Grisham's Bestselling Novels So Appealing?

Have I been avoiding reading John Grisham novels because I'm snooty, or because they're not literary enough? Or, is there some other reason? Most importantly, what have I been missing by not reading him?

That's the subject of this EWA plus the next few I'll be writing.

I'd like to understand, better than I do, why so many are attracted to reading novels by John Grisham while, by comparison, so few are attracted to reading novels by Elizabeth Strout, James McBride, Amor Towles, Marilynn Ronbinson, and Michael Chabon,just to name a few writers whose novels I've written about and whose work I've openly admired. In the case of Strout, Chabon and Robinson, I will be writing about them in the coming months.

The question is not how John Grisham is able to turn out one bestseller after another when compared to the other writers I meantioned. All of them are best-selling authors, universally admired by book reviewers. Rather, I'd like to understand why Grisham's hovels sell like hotcakes when compared to the other novelists.

This off the web: "According to the American Academy of Achievement, Grisham has written 28 consecutive number-one fiction bestsellers, and his books have sold 300 million copies worldwide. Along with Tom Clancy, and J.K. Rowling, Grisham is one of only three authors who have sold two million copies on a first printing."

By comparison, Amor Towles' The Lincoln Highway, which came out in October 2021 and his previous novel, A Gentleman in Moscow, published in 2019 "have collectively sold 4 million copies and have been translated into more than 30 languages."

In this EWA, let's compare and contrast the first 20 pages of Grisham's Sycamore Row to the first 20 pages of Amor Towles' The Lincoln Highway. What can we tell about the entire books just by looking at their opening pages?

The First 20 pages of Grisham's Sycamore Row.

The first chapter (6 pages) covers the apparent suicide scene of Seth Hubbard, a 70+ year old man who is found hanging from a noose that's been strung up on a Sycamore tree, with a ladder apparently kicked aside as Hubbard did away with himself.

The first chapter is written in the style of a police report—an extremely controlled, purposely non-expressive style of writing. Nothing is described that is not what it is, meaning a rope is a rope; a coiled noose is a coiled noose; a rainstorm is a rainstorm.

There is only one paragraph where the omniscient narrator (Grisham's voice) diverts from his police-report style to ask a series of questions: "Had there been an instant of doubt, of second-guessing? When his feet left the safety of the ladder, but with his hands still free, had Seth instinctively grabbed the rope above his head and fought desperately until he surrendered? No one would ever know, but it looked doubtful. Later evidence would reveal that Seth had been a man on a mission."

Chapter 2 is devoted to describing Jake Brigance awaking at 5:25 a.m., dressing, leaving home and driving to his office in the little town of Clanton, Mississippi. Jake is our star-power vehicle, the attorney-personality who ties all of Grisham's novels together. We're immediately sympathetic to the plight of this small-town Mississippi attorney who works such long hours yet earns so little yet, nevertheless, is so maligned by so many. (His house has been burned to the ground by the KKK, for example.)

We see him leaving his home, but before he leaves, he "tiptoed into Hanna's room, kissed her on the cheek and pulled the sheets up a bit higher." What a nice guy. You like Jake. You have to like the guy. Always on the side of right and justice. Who wouldn't like him?

We follow Jake while he unlocks and enters his law office in downtown Clanton, Mississippi. By then we learn Jake and his wife Carla have seriously considered moving away from Clanton, yet they haven't left.

Chapter 2 ends with this sentence: "At 7:00 a.m., on schedule, he sat behind his desk and took a sip of coffee. He looked at his calendar for the day and admitted to himself that it did not look promising or profitable."

With Chapter 3, we have Jake Brigance going through his morning mail and opening a large envelope from the same fellow, Seth Hubbard, who's suicide scene was described in chapter one. The envelope contains Hubbard's last will and testament. That brings us to the end of page 20.

After the first 20 pages, am I fascinated? Do I want to know what happens next? Yes.

It's an out-and-out mystery, you see, where you open with the crime scene, or, in this case, the suicide scene.

The first 20 pages of The Lincoln Highway.

By comparison, Amor Towles' novel opens quietly with our principal protagonist, Emmett Watson, being driven home by his prison warden, Warden Williams, after having served a non-contested manslaughter sentence in a juvenile penal institution. Never mind how unlikely that might be (A warden driving a newly released prisoner home, even if he is under-age.) We get to sit through the warden's pep-talk to Emmett about having served his time, and "paying his debt to society."

On page 5 Warden Williams delivers Emmett into the hands of a rancher, Mr. Ransome, and, less than a page later, into the hands of a banker, Mr. Obermeyer. We learn Emmett and Billy's father has passed away, and the bank is foreclosing on his farm. This scene takes place in the kitchen of the farm house.  The banker has left the electricity turned on in the house out of consideration to Emmett and Billy, with the understanding that they'll move out in a day or two.

In the rest of the opening 20 pages, we see Emmett walking the house where he grew up, knowing that although he was home now, he'll be leaving home with his brother a few days from now. We're treated to memories of the little town in Kansas where he grew up. We meet a neighbor friend, Sally, Mr. Ransome's wife, who brings tonight's dinner in the form of a casserole. Finally, on page 16, Emmett and Billy are left alone. Billy takes a stack of chocolate chip cookies wrapped in aluminum foil from his backpack; he gives his brother one and takes one for himself; and he pours two glasses of milk.

On page 18, "As Emmett smiled and took a sip of milk, he sized up his brother over the rim of the glass. He was about an inch taller and his hair was shorter…. He was happy to be sitting with him at the old kitchen table. He could tell Billy was happy to be sitting there too."

So far, it's not altogether clear what this novel will become. Then, at the end of page 20 the novel declares itself when Billy returns to his backpack and withdraws an envelope of "important papers" he had found in their now deceased father's metal box. "Billy tipped the envelope over the table and out slid nine postcards.

The last words on page 21: "They're postcards," Billy said. "To you and me. From Mom. Nearly eight years had passed since their mother had tucked the two of them in bed, kissed them goodnight…"

And the first words on page 21 are these: "…and walked out the door—and they hadn't heard a word from her since. No phone calls. No letters."

Here you have a sense, in a novel entitled The Lincoln Highway, that the young men are about to leave on a journey to explore their common past, searching for their long-lost mother. Of course, it's obvious to we readers that their mother may not want to be found.

By the time I write next month's EWA (July), I will have read one of the two novels. By the time I publish my August EWA, I will have read both.

We already know this much: Both novels are exciting mysteries. I'd like to figure out: Is my shying away from Grisham based on my shortcomings or his? I want to confront "popular taste" head on. Am I just being snooty? Or, is there something else—something genuine—that separates the 300-million seller from the 4-million seller? That question sure is something "to wrassle with," as we say in Texas.

Forbidden Desire

James McBride's writing class is now in session.

In the midst of a near riot over the distribution of free cheese in a dank basement in a housing project in South Brooklyn, the author of Deacon King Kong, sketches Potts' second visit to "The Cause." Potts an NYPD Sergeant arrives with a number of underlings and other police to investigate recent murders.

That's the surface story. The hypertext is that Potts, an Irish cop, is intensely drawn to Sister Ghee, a black resident of The Cause, yet there is only so far he can go; he's on official business, after all. Yet McBride makes no attempt to censor Pott's thoughts, and therein lies—at least for us, the readers of this brilliant novel—the sweet fruits of forbidden desire.

"Potts turned his attention to Sister Gee. Even on an early, bleak Saturday in that musty, crowded basement, she looked lovely as an Irish spring morning."

"She smiled thinly. She didn't seem happy to see him. 'Seems like you brought the whole force today,' she said."

Potts tells the other residents to speak to the other policemen while he asks Sister Gee, "'Can I speak to you outside?'"

"She followed Potts up the ramp and outside. When they were in the plaza, he turned to her, placed his hands in his pockets and frowned at the ground. She noticed he was wearing a double-breasted sergeant's jacket. He looked quite sharp, she thought, and also bothered. Finally, he looked at her."

Their dialogue—fast as lightning—reveal two people on the same wavelength:

"I will not say I told you so."

"Good."

"But as you know, there's been an incident."

"I heard."

"All of it?"

"No, just rumors. I don't believe in rumors."

The conversation goes back and forth. At certain points Sister Gee is using Potts to find out what happened at the crime scene, and, at other points, Potts is using Sister Gee to understand the background of what actually happened.

Right after she decides that Sportcoat, the principal protagonist, was having an affair with Sister Bibb, she protects her to Potts, telling him, "Sister Bibb wouldn't hurt a fly…"

Potts says, "It's called evidence. I have to ask."

"Potts stared at her. That smile, he thought, is like a rainbow. He tried to keep his voice even, official."

When we readers become aware that Sister Gee has been skirting the truth, misrepresenting, she thought to her herself, "I'll keep lying, just to fold into that big shoulder and see him smile and tell a joke in that heavy, pretty voice he got, the way he did that first day in church.

She smiled a sad, genuine one this time and felt her heart fall to earth as she said the words that brought light to his heart every time he heard them. "Come on back then. Hurry back, if you wanna…"

Potts forced himself to check his emotions. He was at work. People were dead… The best he could get out of it was standing right in front of him, as gorgeous and kind a woman as he'd ever seen.

"We better go back down lest they think we're out here ordering Chinese." He turned to head down the ramp until she touched his arm, stopping him. [They have a quick little exchange of dialogue about the murder that took place. We readers are hanging on the writer's every word, praying something will happen between the man and the woman. More than a little touch on the arm. As readers, I think it's fair to say, we're a little disappointed when nothing happens.

Then, after the cops have left, maybe it's the recent presence of Potts and his fellow cops that gives Sister Gee new insight into her situation and her neighbors and the human tragedies playing out all around her in the housing projects of South Brooklyn.

"Sister Gee stared at her neighbors as they surrounded her, and at that moment she saw them as she had never seen them before; they were crumbs, thimbles, flecks of sugar powder on a cookie, invisible, sporadic dots on the grid of promise…."

"She looked them over, the friends of her life, staring at her. They saw what she saw, they realized. She read it on their faces. They would never win. The game was fixed. The villains would succeed. The heroes would die. The sight of Beanie's mother howling at her son's coffin would haunt them…"

I'm thinking of the outrage expressed by the relatives of loved ones lost to the domestic terrorist/racist who struck just the Saturday before last at the supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y. To a person all the deceased were victims of a hate-crime, just as Beanie was.

The moment of insight James McBride is describing continues: "…all living the New York dream in the Cause Houses, within the sight of the Statue of Liberty, a gigantic copper reminder that this city was a grinding factory that diced the poor man's dreams worse than any cotton gin or sugar-cane field from the old country. And now heroin was here to make their children slaves again, to a useless white power."

The lesson is over. James McBride has just taught us how to make forbidden desire a part of an official investigation that solves nothing yet leaves us feeling achingly sad.

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

On Making a Moment Timeless.

Last month I described how James McBride, in his brilliant novel, Deacon King Kong, goes about creating unforgettable characters. The example I sighted was the case of The Elephant, a shady character who enables timely shipments of illicit goods, yet nevertheless cares for his mother's garden while wistfully lamenting how time has passed him by.

This month we examine another triumph of James McBride, as he takes an encounter between a white Irish New York City cop by the name of Potts. ("Just Potts. It's better than pans.") and "Sister Gee, a tall, handsome black woman of forty-eight…" and makes time stand still.

Their conversation crashes through racial stereotypes and turns intimate, at least in McBride's cosmic-comic sense as Sister Gee, a black maid gets to comment on her opinions about dirt.

"Then she [Sister Gee] turned to him [Police Officer Potts] and said, 'We was talking about something before now?'

"'Dirt,' Potts said.

"'Oh yes,' she said, sitting down again. He saw now she was not just handsome, but rather a cumulative beauty. She was a tall woman, middle-aged, whose face was not etched with the stern lines of church folks who've seen so much and done little about it but pray.

"Her face was firm and decisive, with smooth milky brown skin; the thick hair with a bit of gray, neatly parted; her slender proud frame clad in a modest flower-print dress. She sat erect in the pew; her poise was that of a straight-backed ballet dancer, yet her slim elbows dangling on the rail in front of her, jingling her keys lazily in one hand, eying the white cop, she had an ease and confidence he found slightly unsettling.

"After a moment, she leaned back and placed a slender brown arm on the top edge of the pew, the small movement graceful and supple. She moved, Potts thought, like a gazelle. He suddenly found himself struggling to think clearly."

That was admittedly a long quote, but notice the plain descriptive language used to describe this encounter between an older, white New York City policeman and an older churchgoing black woman from South Brooklyn.

I should tell you the scene does take place in the Five Ends Church near "The Cause" housing projects in south Brooklyn. Officer Potts and his partner, a younger police officer have entered the church as a choir rehearsal is ending in order to investigate and get the goods on an elderly perpetrator who shot a drug dealer. So when the woman leans back in the pew, it's not Officer Potts' ["better than pans"] imagination that she's in a pew. She actually is.

Notice that McBride places his "gazelle" and her admiring interrogator in a church where "no funny stuff" is supposed to happen. I'll bet you sense where this scene is going, with all the verboten sexual desire heaped on top of it; but I couldn't help but notice the calm and grace with which James McBride pulled it off.

Just before this point, Potts had made a reference about "cleaning up some dirt." He's talking of about a crime, but that reference allows Sister Gee, to discuss cleaning dirt as a way of life.

"You said some kind of dirt's harder to clean than others," she said. "Well, that's my job, Officer, I'm a house cleaner, see, I work in dirt. I chase dirt all day. Dirt don't like me."

That might have been quite enough about dirt for some writers, but not for James McBride. He has his character Sister Gee launch into a philosophical discourse on the subject.

"It [dirt] don't set there and say, 'I'm hiding. Come get me.' I go out and find it to clean it out. But I don't hate dirt for being dirt. You can't hate a thing for being what it is. Dirt makes me who I am. Whenever I try to rid the world of it, I'm making things a little harder for somebody. Same with you. The fellers you see, crooks and all, they ain't saying, 'Here I am. Come get me…' You and me has got the same job, in a way. We clean dirt…"

Potts found himself smiling, 'You oughta be a lawyer, he said."

The black house-cleaner talks about herself being a "country woman" from North Carolina. She asks Potts if he's "ever been to the South?" He tells her, "No, but my folks were from Ireland."

She asks him, "Is that an island?" which perhaps tells us she knows more than she's letting on, and he tells her, "It's a place where folks can stop and think. The ones with brains, anyway," which I find to be highly revealing to how the character feels about his forebears' native land.

This is McBride's launching pad, the place where this mutual exploration of two strangers from two remote worlds takes off just as his writing soars. Yet if you examine how he does it, he never varies from his basic stylistic strategy—one simple, declarative sentence piled on top of the next. On the face of it, you'd never think such a literary contraption could never get off the ground, no less fly but, in fact, as I already mentioned, it soars. That's why in my view no one else I know of comes close to McBride's writing accomplishments.

In the middle of all this McBride's writing makes a sharp left turn to a magical place. We're told, "Potts felt as if he were watching a dark, silent mountain suddenly blink to life, illuminated by a hundred lights from a small, quaint village that had lived on the mountainside for a hundred years, the village appearing out of nowhere, all the lights aglow at once."

I love that McBride allows himself these indulgences, insists on not editing out all those little detours; in this case he's describing a woman's face coming alive metaphorically as a village lighting up at night. It's ridiculous, of course. A writing/stylistic perfectionist (such as I used to be) would reject it, leave it on the cutting-room floor. It's awful indulgence. Intolerable! Strictly speaking it makes absolutely no sense, only, to my way of thinking, it's absolutely perfect in a highly flawed way. (I love it, in other words.) Then McBride tells us, "Every feature of her face glowed."

This commonplace meeting between a white policeman and a black woman has already been lifted out of the everyday. But McBride refuses to leave well enough alone. He now launches into outer space, into legendary literary orbit by writing what we're all thinking but wouldn't have the courage to write: "He found himself wanting to tell her every sorrow he ever knew, including the knowledge that the Ireland of the vacation folders wasn't Ireland, that the memory of his ancient grandmother from the old country walking down Silver Street, holding his hand when he was eight, clasping her last nickel in her palm, biting her lip as she hummed a sad song from her childhood of poverty and deprivation, wandering the Irish countryside, looking for home and food, would kick through his arteries and burst into his heart until he was a grown man:

The grass waves green above them; soft sleep is theirs for aye;

The hunt is over, and the cold; the hunger passed away….

Instead, he said simply, 'It wasn't so nice."

James McBride refuses to play "editor cop" in the name of succinctness or literary restraint, something for which I am deeply grateful. Instead, he "goes all in" on behalf of "indulgence" trying for even greater effects:

"She chuckled uneasily, surprised by his response and watched him blush. Suddenly she felt her heart flutter. A charged silence descended on the room. They both felt it, felt themselves being propelled along a great chasm, feeling the irresistible urge to reach out, to reach across. To stretch their hands from opposite sides of a large cavernous valley that was nearly impossible to cross…"

And then:

"She was silent now, the smile gone, looking away, the spell broken."

Just as the spell is broken, McBride's writing lesson is over. He has just taught us—those of us open to learning—how to turn an everyday, commonplace moment into a timeless meeting that, like a butterfly accidently flying too close to your nose, came and went before we had the slightest notion something important had just happened.

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

On Creating Unforgettable Characters.

In this month's EWA I honor author James McBride [Deacon King Kong, 2020, a great novel] for his ability to write unforgettable characters. Each time I open McBride's novel, I whisper to myself, "Class is now in session." You see, his writing speaks to me. It says, "This is how it's done."

Here's one way McBride does it in Deacon King Kong: He introduces us to Guido Elefante, The Elephant, a now middle-aged man raised by a mother who consistently refused to tell him anything about his father.

Guido is sought out by an older man who lets on that he knew this man's father many years earlier. Forgetting the words McBride used to set-up this situation, doesn't the barebones situation itself make you want to hear what this older man has to say about Guido's father? In my case it certainly does.

This is a scene in Chapter 5 of McBride's Deacon King Kong where an Irishman, Driscoll Sturgess, meets Guido for the first time. Here's a dialogue exchange:

"'Salvy Doyle told me you could be trusted.…'

Elefante was silent for a moment, then said, 'Salvy, last I heard, was pushing up worms in Staten Island someplace.'

The Irishman chuckled. "Not when he knew me. Or your father. We were friends."

"My father didn't have friends."

Notice how James McBride has his character say, "Or your father. We were friends" which makes it sound like an afterthought. It's not an afterthought to us. We want to know more. We want to lean it and listen to every word. But Guido doesn't care. He claims his father didn't have friends. Do you see the genius of how James McBride pulls us deeper into the scene and makes us care about Guido? Because Guido cares less, we care more. That's James McBride's genius.

So what has James McBride taught me? Or, what have I chosen to learn from him? If you want to make readers care more about your characters, sometimes, at least, consider telling your readers less, not more. Show what is known, but don't forget to show what the character doesn't know about him or herself, or what doesn't fully make sense to the character about his past. Don't forget your character's inconsistencies. There's mystery in all our pasts. It's what makes us human. If you steamroller the inconsistencies, all you've got left is a macadam surface. Not very interesting.

So, yes, if you like, show us your character as he's talking to himself. Let us, the readers, see the messy conundrums and inconsistencies of a person's life. Make no attempt whatsoever to clean them up. Life is messy. While reading a novel or watching a film we are all attracted to messy lives that don't quite add up.

For example, this passage while The Elephant is tending his mother's flower garden as he contemplates his life:

"He bent over and began digging. I'm the only forty-year-old bachelor in New York, he thought ruefully, whose mother collects flowers like junk—and then expects me to replant whatever crap she finds. But the fact is, he didn't mind. The work relaxed him, and the garden was her pride and joy… [Then he remembers his mother saying] "There's something going around Brooklyn," she declared. "Some kind of disease." The Elephant agreed, but not the kind of disease she was worried about.

Greed, he thought wryly as he dug into the earth. That's the disease. I got it myself."

And that's what James McBride taught me.

Thursday, February 24, 2022

Cloud Cuckoo Land: A Tale of Three Different Tales

The best thing about Anthony Doerr’s Cloud Cuckoo Land is also the very thing that makes it difficult to read and, and, after you’ve read it, to gestalt and remember it as a single work of art.

What’s the best thing? That it intertwines three stories that are united due to their characters’ relationship with an ancient text (which itself is a work of fiction) entitled Cloud Cuckoo Land.

One story takes place in the 1440s in Constantinople in the late Byzantine era, as Muslims are using gunpowder to destroy the walls that have protected this Christian city for more than a century.

Another story takes place in the more-or-less current day. A young boy, drawn into a violent online cult, murders a Korean War Hero who, now in his 80s, only wishes to volunteer his time to encourage children to read. As the Korean War Hero dies, a number of those children are performing Cloud Cuckoo Land in play form.

The third story takes place in the distant future. It’s science-fiction. The Earth has been ruined. A few settlers are launched, sent to colonize a distant planet.One family includes a young lady named Konstance.

Not surprisingly, different writing styles are used to tell the three stories.The Byzantine story calls on the writing of an action-adventure-romance, or an historical romance. At times, it feels as though it’s right out of The Count of Monte Cristo.The contemporary story uses a smart contemporary style; it’s snappy.

The sci-fi story uses a clipped style that cleanly describes what little there is to describe. For the most part it’s a very clean world out there in space.

Of all three stories, the one I became caught up with more than the other two was the Sci-Fi story, especially when a pandemic breaks out on board the spaceship which brings the presence of death so much closer than it was earlier. The young lady named Konstance is constantly visiting the library, spending her entire life looking back on what life was like on planet Earth, thinking how nice it was before everything was ruined. And I thought: Is that what we have to look forward to? I found it so sad.

I am of two opinions about this novel. It’s a bold experiment. In the end I don’t think it works. But in a larger sense, what I think about this book doesn’t matter that much. Anthony Doerr’s stylistic versatility, and his ability to write a great novel is unquestioned. Someday Cloud Cuckoo Land will be viewed as just his warmup act.